Bill Schmalfeldt has a problem. When he is arguing with someone, threatening that someone, trying to intimidate that someone, he has a TERRIBLE habit of trying to pull in a peripheral figure to threaten as well. His thought process seems to believe that threatening someone who isn’t even involved in his current little battle will make his main target give up and go away to protect the uninvolved innocent. Because apparently in his world, threatening other people for no reason is just the thing to do. ESPECIALLY if they are a woman.
So yeah, he’s gone and done it again. Let’s peruse his tweets about it last night, shall we?
So it’s the usual Monkey Dance at the moment. William Schmalfeldt versus Zombie Paul Krendler. And Bill is feeling his oats, thinking he’s got Krendler on the ropes. Why? Who knows, but he does.
The monkey is unable to discern just *who* is dancing for *whom*. Typical, and but not unexpected.
Now, why would Krendler truly care what a dying radio network would say about Bill Schmalfeldt? Anyone with a brain (or eats them for FUN) knows that the only radio stations that would accept the Blubby Blob are ones that he would have to pay for the priveledge. And even with the urnings he has recently received, there’s no real way that he’s going to pay as much as they require because he just doesn’t have the funds to sustain the relationship, nor does he have the listeners and subscribers to pay for the timeslot. So any mention is purely stick-poking. A normal person would recognize that. But not our Bill! Oh no! He’s got his “manhood” to strut about obviously.
WTF? Why on earth would Krendler care about some trust on the West Coast?
Oh! Now I see it. There he goes again.
The lovely Dianna, who happens to comment here as well as on other sites, doesn’t even have a presence on Twitter and who actually has a life unlike Bill, is being drawn into the pissing contest.
And for what?
For having a bad opinion about Bill Schmalfeldt. Go figure.
Really? You think that the Frisco papers would care about your accusations? You’ve threatened this before, I think. And, of course, as usual, you never followed through and/or the papers didn’t give a rat’s ass about what you were saying. Because butthurt on teh Interwebz is so passe, especially when the one crying “foul” is actually a bully – having several restraining orders from several states tends to harm a person’s reputation. I’m just sayin’.
Now comes the bargaining.
So if she isn’t even really involved in this current iteration of your blather, but commented on it in the past and WASN’T EVEN THE WORST, why are you bothering threatening her? I mean, you DO realize how awful of a person this makes you look, right?
So what was so bad about what she said?
Good thing for her, her trustees have long been told about the situation with you and the things you try to do to people. Frankly, I don’t think Dianna gives two figs about what you are threatening.
Take note, people! If Bill Schmalfelt knows your real name, knows who you really are, he WILL NOT HESITATE to threaten your livelihood for words you did not say and things you did not do.
And he WONDERS why most people who deal with him prefer to keep anonymous.
Who is the odious one now? I think we all know.
And maybe someone else should watch out for what lawyers will think about them. Just sayin’.
Because he just looooooves Doubling Down (see SJWs Always Lie). He never, EVER knows when to quit.