Lawsuit Scoreboard
Your Zombie Mistress
Recent Comments
Kyle Kiernan on Oh Yes. Jourminalism! Dr_Mike on Oh Yes. Jourminalism! John “Minemyown” Doe on Oh Yes. Jourminalism! Pablo on Oh Yes. Jourminalism! Pablo on Oh Yes. Jourminalism! Because All the Cool Kids Are Doing It
BILLY SEZ - Adventures in Bill Schmalfeldt's Pretendy Land Internet Courtroom. All Rise! 
EXTORTION!
LikeLiked by 4 people
So funny. He accuses a lawyer in good standing, who is zealously representing his clients’ interests by offering a settlement agreement, of extortion. He then turns around and demands relief to which he is not entitled—the closing of this blog—to forestall his taking adverse action. The very definition of extortion.
LikeLiked by 7 people
Being crazy, drunk and stupid means never having to be consistent.
LikeLiked by 6 people
Reads like a threat to me.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Could be. After all, he’s a 61 year old widower with Parkinson’s, no prospects for a date, a full bladder and nary a child nearly. He’s got nothing to lose!
LikeLiked by 4 people
Sorry, nary a child nearby.
It’s a good thing I can spell my own name in 9 out of 10 court filings. Otherwise I’d be an idiot.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Yep. Time for criminal charges.
Enough is enough.
LikeLiked by 1 person
C’mon, The Johnnie Walker Red Baron’s ability to communicate with law enforcement will save the day. Remember last year when he wrote to a Tennessee sheriff that he “probably” wasn’t a child pornographer?
LikeLiked by 4 people
Were it not self-awareness fail every single solitary time….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, how the loathsome loser hates being accurately quoted!
LikeLiked by 4 people
The more things change the more they stay the same.
wannabe
LikeLiked by 4 people
I’ll take direct contact in violation of a protective order for “fine and/or imprisonment”, Alex.
LikeLiked by 6 people
And you haven’t even seen the half of the comments he’s left since Saturday.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He’s going to spend more money trying to shut down a blog rather than do the only choice left to him – he wants this and other blogs about him to go away, all he has to do is disappear from the internet. Forever. Otherwise, his legacy will be his own doing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
If Billy Sez disappears someone will only create a “Bill Shmalfeldt pees on children ” website.
He needs to stop digging…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Seriously. DUMBF5CK has been trying to shut us up for, what?, 4 years now? And we just get louder and louder the more he tries to bully us into silence. Sociopath Bill Schmalfeldt really needs to take a lesson from what happened to Deb Frisch, who spent half of 2015 behind bars.
LikeLike
Rapidly approaching “nearly 400”? 🙂
LikeLike
I really like redheads.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Go fuck yourself with an urn clock, Shakes.
LikeLiked by 8 people
I usually say “sideways, with a cactus” but yours works as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m guessing you’re refusing his demand?
LikeLiked by 3 people
What was your first clue?
Heh.
LikeLike
She said no. Now go away.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Something tells me LiberalBill Schmalfeldt on OurTime (also known as William Munko on Facebook and Bill Schmalfeldt on the 9 restraining orders he’s been hit with in 6 states) will be told this by law enforcement if some woman is careless enough to meet him.
LikeLike
Old skool:
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really do believe that Witless Willie is planning a brand new LOLsuit.
Can he figure out which forum has jurisdiction this time around? Can he figure out how to effect proper service this time around? Can he figure out how to disqualify counsel this time around? Can he figure out how to spell his name right this time around? Can he figure out how to allege a tort recognized in the relevant forum this time around? Can he figure out how to avoid defaulting this time around?
Anyone want to bet me that he can leap all those hurdles?
LikeLiked by 5 people
Will he even serve the right complaint? A DUMBFUCK didn’t last time.
The incompetence is astounding, yet endlessly entertaining!
LikeLiked by 5 people
I was including that under effecting proper service, but you are correct. It does help to serve the right complaint on the right party. This time around he may not name as many defendants so he may find it easier to keep track of which complaint is operative. Last time, he had, if I remember correctly, 28 named and unnamed defendants, 3 more than his fingers and toes, so it was understandably hard to keep track.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As I remember it, DUMBFUCK was being cheap and mailed his complaint, decided to amend it and hired process servers, who served the amended complaint.
The defendants received the same complaint, but had no idea which one they were supposed to respond to because impulse control. It was breathtakingly funny!
I also believe that there are only two potential targets resident in North Carolina that anyone knows about. If he adds defendants willy-nilly (and he will,) he runs into the same venue and personal jurisdiction problems he had last time.
Finally, because he’s the Diminished Capacity Kid, he’s already essentially a successful Motion to Dismiss for any and all defendants he names in Lulzsuit VII.
I have another theory about what he’ll do, but it’s not one I want to discuss in public.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Egads, I’m bad today!
That should read “he’s already essentially WRITTEN a successful Motion to Dismiss for any and all defendants he names in Lulzsuit VII.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Neal
I would have to go back and read carefully. If I remember correctly, Willy sent out the original complaint with a waiver of service form (proper procedure). Service was not waived by Ash and BPO. So the original complaint was not served upon them at the beginning. This refusal to waive got Witless all upset: he seemed to think that waiving was mandatory (a situation that would seem to make the process of waiver completely redundant). At some point Willie amended his complaint, but he did so after the period when he was entitled to do so as a matter of right. When he finally did effect service on Ash and BPO, he served the amended complaint, which was not a valid complaint. So he never properly served them with any complaint at all.
I may not be remembering correctly of course. As Aaron said at the time, Willy made such a hash of his case that a class on civil procedure could use it as comedic relief. So I recollect more clearly the more bizarre aspects of the case, like Witless filing an affadavit from a convicted perjurer rather than his misadventures with the pedestrian rules for effecting service.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I believe you’re correct.
The lesson in all of this? Don’t drink and sue!
LikeLiked by 4 people
Comedic relief indeed, but also a wonderful trick exam question:
On Day 1 a pro se plaintiff files a suit against your client in the 7th Circuit Federal Court claiming diversity of citizenship and damages exceeding $75,000.
On Day 7 your client receives a copy of the complaint in the mail along with a waiver of service form. You advise your client to do nothing, even though a quick read through of the complaint shows solid grounds for a motion to dismiss based on jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
On Day 28 the pro se plaintiff files an amended complaint in the suit against your client.
On Day 30 a process server effects service on your client with the amended complaint.
Should you:
a) File an appearance and motion to dismiss based on the original complaint;
b) File an appearance and motion to dismiss based on the amended complaint; or
c) Do nothing except monitor the docket via PACER. Note: if you choose this option, explain below what you would watch for on the docket and how you would respond to what you’re watching for.
LikeLiked by 6 people
He’ll go asshole over elbows like a Scootypuff over a curb!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Vroom, VROOM!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Be a shame if he but the curb while he was down there.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I picture Bill’s next lawsuit going about like this. (BTW, he finally started to transition)
LikeLiked by 3 people
LikeLike
I found another answer:
LikeLiked by 3 people
“Be careful what you wish for, Sarah, Close this blog.”
Lets break down this statement.
Be careful what you wish for is an idiom, but also in context can be construed as part of a threat.
Sarah
Of course this is naming you.
Close this blog.
This is a demand for action .
So if we piece this together. There is giving context a threat, naming you, and demanding an action.
If only there was a judicial order baring such actions against you and your family and which this other attempted contacts could be used to show one violating said order.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh yes. If only. Because that is a *definite* threat.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yet another answer for the toddlerstalker:
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shakey’s date end early? Quick in and out sexual assault?
LikeLike
It was a woman so sex was definitely out. She was also probably (provably?) over the age of 8 so again, sex was out.
LikeLike
Pingback: Logins | BILLY SEZ – The Failed Plaintiff Bill Schmalfeldt Feldtdown Observer