Why on Earth would Bill Schmalfeldt believe that ANYONE is going to pay serious attention to his purported “outing” of someone new.
Remember, this is a man who only a few hours ago posted THIS:
So when someone who just posted saying that things on this particular Twitter account would be mixing information with misinformation, there is absolutely no way in hell anyone can believe his assertions in this newest FAILDOX:
See, Bill Schmalfeldt has confirmation bias. Only a few weeks ago, he posted claims on his blog that pornographic pictures of a Halo character (who happens to have the same name as I do) in an imgur account were OBVIOUSLY posted by me because it had the name (that we both share, mind you!) as the title of the album. So OF COURSE I have a thing for posting pornographic pictures in Bill Schmalfeldt’s mind and he has to broadcast it as such.
If I knew of someone “A” who was proclaiming that they were going to sue someone “B” and A was accusing B of that sort of defamatory action, I would suggest to A that they refrain from making those claims and that they take down those claims as well. Clean hands doctrine and all that. But then again, this is Bill Schmalfeldt we are talking about. Everything boils down to nasty things that one just doesn’t say in polite company. Which is why a lot of people think he’s disgusting.
But I digress!
Now Bill Schmalfeldt claims that one Digital Tuna is another digitaltuna.
No two people can have the same name according to Bill Schmalfeldt. One instantly becomes the other. We have seen this over and over and over again from him.
Again I ask the question: Who in the right mind, reading that Bill Schmalfeldt has said that the twitter account he is posting from was going to be telling both real and fake information, would actually believe him? Heck, would would believe him any time?