Based Both on Past Behavior and Current Stated Behavior

Why on Earth would Bill Schmalfeldt believe that ANYONE is going to pay serious attention to his purported “outing” of someone new.

Remember, this is a man who only a few hours ago posted THIS:

Screenshot 2016-07-11 21.57.30

So when someone who just posted saying that things on this particular Twitter account would be mixing information with misinformation, there is absolutely no way in hell anyone can believe his assertions in this newest FAILDOX:

Screenshot 2016-07-11 21.51.49

See, Bill Schmalfeldt has confirmation bias. Only a few weeks ago, he posted claims on his blog that pornographic pictures of a Halo character (who happens to have the same name as I do) in an imgur account were OBVIOUSLY posted by me because it had the name (that we both share, mind you!) as the title of the album. So OF COURSE I have a thing for posting pornographic pictures in Bill Schmalfeldt’s mind and he has to broadcast it as such.

If I knew of someone “A” who was proclaiming that they were going to sue someone “B” and A was accusing B of that sort of defamatory action, I would suggest to A that they refrain from making those claims and that they take down those claims as well. Clean hands doctrine and all that. But then again, this is Bill Schmalfeldt we are talking about. Everything boils down to nasty things that one just doesn’t say in polite company. Which is why a lot of people think he’s disgusting.

But I digress!

Now Bill Schmalfeldt claims that one Digital Tuna is another digitaltuna.

No two people can have the same name according to Bill Schmalfeldt. One instantly becomes the other. We have seen this over and over and over again from him.

Again I ask the question: Who in the right mind, reading that Bill Schmalfeldt has said that the twitter account he is posting from was going to be telling both real and fake information, would actually believe him? Heck, would would believe him any time?

 

About The Dread Pirate Zombie

Member of the Zombie Horde and Lickspittle Minion. Out to eat your brainnnsssss. And a few other sweetbreads because they are so nomm-y. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
This entry was posted in Bill, Hypocrisy, PLM. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to Based Both on Past Behavior and Current Stated Behavior

  1. Jane says:

    No one would believe anything from a lying liar who lies when the truth would better serve.

    Liked by 5 people

  2. Neal N. Bob says:

    https://twitter.com/MusicUnshackled/status/752687149342924800

    First, Golden Showers Schmalfeldt’s brothers probably died of shame. It’s hard to imagine any other diagnosis.

    Second, in the highly unlikely event that this doxx is correct, I’m not sure that getting the attention of Kiwi Farms and 4Chan types is going to end the way that the Diminished Capacity Kid thinks it will. He thinks his life is miserable now? It could dramatically worse incredibly fast.

    Liked by 6 people

  3. Dianna says:

    He can’t tell a Grail from a glass of beer.

    Like

  4. This Other Latin F*cker says:

    In my fondest dreams old William “Stolen Valor” Schmalfeldt gets the attention he seems to crave from the chan folks. Oh please, please, please let this come to pass.

    Liked by 6 people

  5. Take it down or I’ll SUE.

    LULZ. No one is sweating you, Schmalfeldt. Ever. Go find another receptacle, I mean soul mate.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. William Milkshakesphere says:

    https://twitter.com/MusicUnshackled/status/752714434569768960

    Bwahaha, no evidence of that, Dumbfuck. I believe her over you.

    Liked by 4 people

    • JeffM says:

      Witless Willie has, if I remember correctly, previously alleged that Ash lied in court and that he would go after her for perjury. Am I misremembering or has Ash been indicted?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Last I checked…. that would be a no. Bill made the fatal mistake of not getting [REDACTED – you know better than that, Morgana! – PK] which the judge [REDACTED – PK]. If only he realized that the very first thing that he claimed was a lie just wasn’t so because of that.

        And as for the rest? Last time I checked, differences of opinion does not equal lying. Gotta remember – three sides to the truth. Mine, yours, and what really occurred. Thankfully for me, my opinion about what Bill Schmalfeldt was doing was backed up by the actual words he sent me. Two sides matching up equals a preponderance of the evidence. Oopsie Poopsie!

        sarc Oh, who am I kidding. This is Bill Schmalfeldt. Evidence be damned, I’m OBVIOUSLY guilty. /sarc

        Liked by 3 people

  7. A.B. says:

    So according to BS…. “Digital Tuna” must be “digitaltuna” because they have the same screen name and all of the postings (including the “sisters panties” ones) can be attributed to both since they are, in BS mind, one and the same. Ok…

    Well… I wonder what might start popping up from searches of an Internet user going by the name “billschmalfeldt” and all the… hmm… interesting things he might post out there.

    Now granted to any normal person the Internet user “billschmalfeldt” shouldn’t automatically be construed to be the more notorious Internet user “Bill Schmaleldt”… but hey thats not how Bills logic works and we are supposed to accept it at face value!

    Oh the places “billschmaldfeltd” will go… ;D

    Liked by 3 people

  8. This Other Latin F*cker says:

    https://twitter.com/MusicUnshackled/status/752714129736073216

    I seem to remember Bill “Stolen Valor” Schmalfeldt bragging about fucking a hooker on stage in Japan in front of paying customers. He admitted to being married at the time. Oh, the hypocrisy of William “I want to urinate on children” Schmalfeldt.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Jane says:

      Don’t forget the fat freak cheating with Hell’s Kitchen Kate, at least that’s what I heard. From her. hahaha The only reason the loathsome loser didn’t cheat more is that most women pass out or have to be treated for alcohol poisoning long before getting drunk enough.

      Liked by 4 people

Leave a comment