And when has that ever stopped him?
Ever convinced that he is CORRECT, Errorist Jourminalist Bill Schmalfeldt keeps tilting that favorite windmill of his – DEFAMATION!!!11!!!1!. Albeit a bit more ineptly than Don Quixote (and certainly less eloquently than the good Don).
Which means that it’s a day that ends in “Y.” More FUN and PLM after the jump y’all!
Here’s a hint, Bill. Iffen you don’t want to be called a adjudicated harasser or stalker, why don’t you, oh, I don’t know, NOT DO THAT SORT OF BEHAVIOR? You know, if you didn’t email people after they told you not to, email their relatives, phone up their relatives, etc., etc., all because you think you have a right to do so, then maybe people wouldn’t think your behavior was threatening. And because they then wouldn’t think your behavior was threatening, they wouldn’t seek to have a peace order against you. Or a no stalking order. Or a no harassment order. All just to get you to STOP. CONTACTING. THEM.
Really, it’s quite simple.
And oh look! The lawyer tells you that yeah, for the average layman, calling you an adjudicated harasser/stalker, et al is somewhat accurate.
BZZZZZT! Bill is wrong. Go figure. To a lawyer, sure, the term is wrongly used in this instance (however, not with Brett Kimberlin. Heh!) but not to the average man on the street.
But still, he continues on (as he always does).
To an average human being, having to be TOLD by a COURT to LEAVE SOMEONE ALONE, yeah, you’ve been found “guilty” of stalking. We give Bill the little elide of “adjudicated” to make his fee fees feel better, and because we know that a full criminal trial has not be held. But to a reasonable man? Hell yeah you are guilty.
Since a no-harassment/stalking order was issued, yeah, he’s an adjudicated stalker. Not just once, because we know Bill likes to go big or go home, but NINE TIMES. Nine! And not by the same person.
I don’t know about you, but I have never, ever heard of anyone having done that much stuff to have that many orders of protection granted against you. I’ve seen people who are nutjobs who try and get no-stalking orders against every Tom, Dick and Harry, sure. But never, ever someone who collects them this way.
It is a puzzlement, to be sure, why said person keeps throwing himself against this particular brick wall of wanting to nail somebody for the supposed defamation it is to call someone who has received nine no harassment/stalking orders from various people an adjudicated stalker/harasser. Perhaps because it’s not.
Here’s a hint for anyone out there on how to NOT be called an adjudicated harasser/stalker. Leave people alone when they ask you to. Quit intruding into their personal space. Quit calling up/emailing their relatives. Then no harassment/stalking orders wouldn’t be taken out against you. The end.