Apparently there appears to be an equal dearth of both with Bill Schmalfeldt recently (always?).
- The last time Bill Schmalfeldt sued people, he got a lawyer paid for by the State of Illinois. After the consultation, the case was summarily dismissed. This new suit of Bill’s has essentially the same charges. Yet Bill scoffs and thinks “real lawyers” won’t defend those he is in opposition to?
- No more freebie amendments allowed. Somehow I know that all defendants will vigorously oppose any such amendment, seeing as how summonses have supposedly gone out.
- Seeing as how the “charges” against Eric have all been recycled from past butthurt lawsuits – and we all know how those went – I think it doesn’t take a genius to figure out just whose case is “doomed” or not.
It seems that Bill Schmalfeldt is impersonating a lawyer with his supposedly keen legal acumen. At least if you compare him to this:
Lawyers are like rhinoceroses: thick skinned, short-sighted, and always ready to charge.
David Mellor (b. 1949), British Conservative politician
Well, two out of three points isn’t all that bad. lol