I spent yesterday getting a long-awaited massage (Note to self, your body is more fucked up than you think. Quit putting things like this off! It’s called THERAPY for a reason, dum-dum!) and indulging in retail therapy (Fabric! It calls to me! I must HAVE ALL THE THINGS FABRIC!) before having a delightful dinner with my family (daughter wanted crab legs, and by God, she got some! lol).
And now that I come to check on my blog, what do I see? Oh look. Bill’s got some things to say. And guess what? I have some things to say in return to some of his stuff.
And with this, I thank Sarah for giving me the opportunity to state my case. Once the judge rules on the MTD, I no longer have an issue with her, so I will drop her from the lawsuit.
Yawn. You never had an issue with me, except butthurt, Bill, which isn’t a tort. And you still can’t get my name right, which will be a huge issue for you. AND you keep saying you’ll drop me but you haven’t. I’ll believe it when I see it. You are welcome to continue posting, so long as you don’t break my rules. Most of which are unwritten, but at least you haven’t broken them. Yet.
II. MY MOTHER’S DEATH. What I did or did not do was none of your business. I maintained contact with friends and family via Twitter and e-mail. Mom was non responsive. I talked to her, but even I run out of things to say, so I gave my people an hourly rundown of what the situation was. I do not regret a thing. I was with her when she died. I put a rosary in her hand about a half hour earlier. I did my duty as a good son who loves his mother.
Actually, you made it people’s business. While your mother was dying, you were tweeting Aaron Walker and casting gypsy curses on Twitter. I’ve seen the screenshots. I don’t have them at my fingers at the moment, but if I did, you can darned well be certain I would post them to prove you WRONG, yet again.
I’m glad you were with your mom. I hope I get that opportunity myself some day. But quit climbing up on this cross and making it out to be something that it wasn’t. You were lashing out at people during a supposedly private and intense time in your life. If you think people aren’t going to comment on your PUBLIC actions, you are sorely mistaken.
Dave Alexander, sometime I find it hard to put a finger on you and what you want. You were not doxxed. Your address, phone number, or any other non-publicly available personal info were not included. And yes, I did contact your employer to see if any of your defamatory posts were made on company time and equipment — just like a lawyer would do.
Dave did not defame you. Again, you were just butthurt, which is not a tort and not actionable. AND YOU ARE NOT A FUCKING LAWYER! Omg, really? You went beyond the bounds of common decency and into completely unhinged fucktard territory, yet again, contacting his employer. WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT? Oh, Bill Schmalfeldt. That’s right. Because he can. Because he’s a loon.
I would be happy to modify my lawsuit and let the following people off the hook. Sarah, Edgren, Hinckley (even though he continues his stupid defamatory posts and comments). I will not drop the charges against Hoge, Howard Earl, Roy Schmalfeldt or “Grace.” They went too far,and if the court sees my way, they will pay for it.
YOU ARE NOT SUING HOGE! At least not in this particular LOLsuit. You just can’t get him out of your brain, can you? And you know what? Fuck you. Keep me in your damn suit. Frankly, I don’t care, because it will be laughed out of court long before you get to *try* to actually find me. The court won’t see your way, because, again, it’s butthurt. And no, they/I won’t be your personal piggy bank, no matter what fantasy you tell yourself in your head.
An additional though struck me right after I hit post comment. You have to ask yourselves, Are you good people, or are you cruel? I am going to leave you alone. Can I count on the same courtesy? If not, then that question is answered.
That’s a question YOU should have asked yourself a long, long, long time ago, Bill. When you started photoshopping skulls on babies and tormenting mothers whose children died. Heck, long before even that. YOU are the cruel one here. You will never, ever own it, unfortunately, but there are many of us out there who know who you are. You can try to paint a pretty picture, but the internet is forever. And when you say you apologized and then continue to say the same things that you apologized for, that isn’t an apology.
I don’t email you as a general rule. I don’t post on your websites. I don’t comment on your podcasts. I don’t tweet you. I leave you alone, Bill. You have a really funny definition of “leave you alone.” Essentially, you have to come to my house to see what I’m talking about in my living room and to talk back to me. I don’t go to yours. So be assured I will leave you alone. But will YOU leave ME alone? I don’t think you have the capability.
Be well.
The pathetic thing is, we’re all he has.
Even more pathetic, he still thinks the lolsuit is a threat.
LikeLiked by 3 people
“The pathetic thing is, we’re all he has.”
That’s pretty much my analysis.
And it’s sad, really. He could be trying to start over, to build at least a new life with what time he has left. Instead, he continues to flail, and now things are starting to get serious. People have run out of patience. He’s made several critical errors which are being capitalized on.
The avalanche has started, and it is too late for the pebbles to vote.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Instead, he continues to flail, and now things are starting to get serious.
He’s got 55 years of history to deal with. Roy can probably chime in here with lots of particulars.
This is how he works, he knows nothing else, believes it to be how things should be, and cannot do anything else.
For this to change would require outside intervention. Notably, the US Navy and NIH failed to change him, despite obvious attempts to try.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Toastrider’s channeling Kosh?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Could provide particulars, but why bother? Cousin Bill has screwed himself over so badly, this time, that he’s out of runway to make corrections.
He’ll die, unloved, impoverished, and alone.
That’s all anyone needs to know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How much of Bill is nature, and how much is nurture? I mean, was he a normal kid until an unfortunate incident at scout camp, or was he tearing the wings off flies from the get go?
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Billy Sez – Adventures in the
LikeLiked by 1 person
What lawyer does that, ever? Pyschos do that, not lawyers.
LikeLiked by 6 people
A lawyer might do that if the company had any liability, but butthurt isn’t a tort.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Call a company and ask them if he should be suing them? I’m guessing no.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was a faildoxx: Bill thought he had identified someone weak. Oh, and on the subject of strategy: I’ve written hundreds of truthful words about the very public Bill Schmalfeldt on my tiny blog, have given him an opportunity to discover any falsity, and still he’s stumped. Alexander’s Corollary to the McCain Rule: The second best way to discredit Bill Schmalfeldt is to write about him truthfully.
LikeLiked by 1 person
AMEN!
LikeLike
Good lord the dude is a putz.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Willie offers the following “deal:” we stop writing about him, and he will stop doing what he does.
First, some of us do not believe that he will honor the spirit of any deal.
Second, what he is really offering is this: if X stops writing ABOUT him, he will not try to do TO X any of the things he tries to do to his perceived enemies, such as trying to get them fired or separated from their children. I am not interested in such a deal. Some of the things he does to others are legal though immoral. Others are possibly illegal but not effectively stopped by legal means. Ridicule, mockery, and shame are reasonable social responses to such behavior. So long as he persists in tormenting the Hoges and others, then I shall continue to mock him.
Third, he and his pals are a threat to the social meaning of free speech. He is sueing Ash for things Ash did not say to him, but merely said about him on a blog where he is free to respond, challenge, or correct. He is in a rage over comments about his dead wife, comments not made by Ash and specifically not permitted on Ash’s site. With rare exceptions, the only socially acceptable response to public speech should be public speech. So long as he attacks others’ legal, public speech through any means except public speech, he deserves to be held up to public obloquy and contempt for such behavior.
Fourth, I now understand from reading his own words that he had sex with someone on stage in front of a paying audience, and that he is confident that his partner in that tasteful but apparently very brief episode was and always had been female. I must admit I don’t see how his partner’s chromosomes make much difference, but at least I am sensitive enough to keep them in mind for the future because Willie seems to feel that they materially change things.
PS If his normal duration in his youth was just a minute, that certainly makes what I have heard about his marital history quite explicable.
LikeLiked by 6 people
Willie offers the following “deal:” we stop writing about him, and he will stop doing what he does.
Except for the parts – where other people make him- where he continues doing what he does without any change.
Heads I win, tails you lose.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Fourth, I now understand from reading his own words that he had sex with someone on stage in front of a paying audience, and that he is confident that his partner in that tasteful but apparently very brief episode was and always had been female.
The pathological hypocrisy that is Willy:
You see, he writes vile screeds and does podcasts on politicians and others who he claims are homophobic yet he himself finds gay sex so repugnant that he considers it libel for someone to allege he engaged in it.
Unravel that hairball if you dare.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Cluebat to Mr. Sacred Honor: The reprehensible act is screwing a sex worker in front of a paying audience – that’s the sting.
Although I have my doubts about anything you say. Maybe you just saw someone else do it, maybe you banged a tranny, maybe the “artiste” banged you.
I don’t seed that its a distinction with much of a difference.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I wonder if Bill has any understanding of two fundamental rules from his days in the Navy:
1. What happens on deployment *stays* on deployment
2. If you weren’t there, you don’t have a need to know.
Any memories of that discussion with your Sea Daddy, Bill? Imagine how much calmer your life would be if you followed that advice.
For those with no Navy experience, a Sea Daddy is your mentor at your first command helping you thru the unwritten parts of Navy life, no physical relationship is implied by anyone….
LikeLiked by 2 people
He has a hard time knowing what I want because he (and some of y’all) have a hard time imagining someone being in his sights and yet coming through it NOT being permanently angry. I didn’t defame him before — and he knows that because he really looked hard! Since then, I’ve given him more and more opportunities to set the record straight on key facts. He clearly does not understand that. He also doesn’t understand that I have not resorted to name-calling.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Just noticed the wording on this: “I will not drop the charges…”
Charges? There are no “charges”. Bill is not a prosecutor, and no crimes have been committed, only alleged by someone with a reputation for being as flaky as phyllo dough.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Oh, but he has such delusions of grandeur, Rob. Such delusions.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I did not even bother to comment on that part of Willie’s drivel. He says he will drop Ash after the motion to dismiss is ruled on. If she wins the motion to dismiss, then there is nothing for him to drop. If he is willing to drop her even if she loses her motion to dismiss, then he could save her and himself a ton of trouble by dropping her now.
I am not keeping track of the blow by blow on his suit, but has he even properly served the complaint on her yet?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nope.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have yet to be served. He cannot serve me because he does not know who I am, despite thinking he knows who I am. If he serves the person he *thinks* is me, he will be serving someone completely unconnected to this issue, a true innocent. And then let the fireworks begin!
LikeLiked by 2 people
He would only serve an innocent because you MADE HIM DO IT!
LikeLiked by 4 people
Of COURSE I made him do it! I wouldn’t just tell him who I was or send him an affidavit that I signed in front of a notary apologizing for something I didn’t do or any of a number of other things he wants me/you/us to do to salve his wounded ego. IT’S ALL MY FAULT!
lol
LikeLike
So, BS, the person who likes to call his ex wives, particularly the second one, adulterous whore and meth addict ( to see some of his greatest hits, see Lee Stranahan’s blog), has:
1. Admitted that he smoked pot with his stepson;
2. Admitted that he had sex with and moved in with the woman who would become his third wife while he was married to wife #2; and
3. Appears to have admitted to adultery again, supra, because he was married to wife #2 and stationed in Japan with his family when he had sex on stage with a prostitute.
Is this correct? I should say, of course, that I have screen shots of all of the aforesaid comments on which I am basing this analysis.
Everyone should keep these things in mind the next time he calls people adulterous whores, pornographers, or addicts.
LikeLiked by 3 people
“Projection” is not a river in Egypt…
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s my line.
LikeLike
Bill does not realize just how bad he is screwed. He had best hope that his LOLsuit is dismissed soon. If it somehow survives and it gets to the point where I get to file a counterclaim, the hammer will come down. The intentional infliction of emotional distress from contacting my wife with the intent of causing martial discord is a slam dunk, and will include as evidence the WHOLE email (hint, hint) he sent to her business. And those aren’t the only torts I can actually prove, unlike his fantasy of a suit.
Not much longer now….
LikeLiked by 7 people
If Cousin Bill succeeds in dragging me into court, a DNA test, and testimony as to the impeccable evidence trail of a decades old crime, by a certain Midwestern police department, is inevitable.
LikeLiked by 7 people
I know it would be timen and annoyance for the defendants, but I actually rather wish that would happen.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nail it’s ass to the wall! Granted you will need a forklift just for the amount of nails it would take…..
LikeLiked by 3 people
Wow agile. If he caused martial levels of violence in your marital relations, even if nuclear weapons were not employed, that’s a slam dunk winner for a jury to find intentional infliction of emotional distress.
LikeLiked by 2 people
TICK TOCK!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I would have taken time to ask the court if it complied with the regulations to make the witness stand the attorney and plaintiff table – clowntiff accessible. The entrance and the aisles should be wide enough to facilitate passage for extra large rubber shoes, hoop skirt hips (some clowns not needing this enhancement) that are able to pass through the metal detectors. Accomidations should also be made for little cute monkey diapers and snacks so the clowntiffs have their muse with them at all times.
Also a makeup mirror and defused lighting is essential in maintaining clowntiff decorum….
LikeLike