I Believe Bill Schmalfeldt Has Something To Say

About people who don’t follow through with things they can do.

Ashampoo_Snap_2016.07.07_08h41m05s_036_

First, No. Won’t be closing. Not any time soon. And certainly NOT for a brilliant parody that I’ve said several times was a modified comment. Tough cookie. Bill Schmalfeldt chose to comment on this website. He chose to try to humiliate one of my commenters with his usual vile filth. He got edited and definitely got what he deserved as a result.

Second, I believe Bill Schmalfeldt’s term for people who don’t follow through on things like what he said above is “Pussy.” Oh yeah. It is.

Ashampoo_Snap_2016.07.07_08h48m04s_039_

And we all know what Bill Schmalfeldt is. A big, fat pussy. Because, really. What is he going to do? Sue me? Did that once twice already and got his ass handed to him this time by the judge because he was a DUMBFUCK like usual and forged on ahead even though he was TOLD he was doing it wrong. And he FAILED. As usual.

I guess that’s a better step up from his running away with a trail of fear pee behind him from the first time he sued me though, right? Progress? Anyway….

Beaten by a girl. That never goes too well for him, does it? This is quite the temper tantrum he’s having as a result. *snort*

Popcorn anyone?

About The Dread Pirate Zombie

Member of the Zombie Horde and Lickspittle Minion. Out to eat your brainnnsssss. And a few other sweetbreads because they are so nomm-y. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
This entry was posted in Bill, Butthurt, Hypocrisy, PLM. Bookmark the permalink.

72 Responses to I Believe Bill Schmalfeldt Has Something To Say

  1. Jane says:

    Self-humiliating and self-described Happy My Wife Died woo hoo TheMerryWidower‘s upset that it has so thoroughly disgraced its name, and repeatedly shown what a malicious, vicious, and depraved monster it is that it will never get a date with anyone who has internet access. Since it has no friends or family who want anything to do with the loathsome loser, there aren’t social occasions where it may meet someone who doesn’t use the internet, and whose family despises enough that they won’t bother to google either.

    On at least some level, Bill Schmalfeldt has come to the realization that it will it die alone, like its late wife died alone because the grotesque ghoul was busy on the internet describing her “death rattle” and trying to paint its vile self as a victim. The malignant monster will not only die alone, no one will claim that huge pile of ashes.

    Why is HZIC laughing?

    Liked by 3 people

    • Paul Krendler says:

      Mainly I’m laughing because the only means Bill Schmalfeldt has to meet women is…

      THE INTERNET.

      You know, that place where the first thing ANYBODY does on meeting someone new on any form of dating site

      ON THE INTERNET

      is type your name into Google so they can get a first impression

      FROM THE INTERNET

      of this person that they just met

      ON THE INTERNET.

      And the really funny thing

      ABOUT THE INTERNET

      is that it’s

      FOREVER.

      So anything you have written

      ON THE INTERNET

      for example:

      BILL SCHMALFELDT PUBLISHING ON HIS BLOG PHOTOGRAPHS OF DEAD BODIES IN A POST-AUTOPSY STATE BEING SEXUALLY VIOLATED

      or

      BILL SCHMALFELDT EMAILING DEATHBED PHOTOGRAPHS OF HIS SOULMATE TO THE WORLD AT LARGE

      or

      BILL SCHMALFELDT POSTING PHOTOGRAPHS OF HIS OWN BARE ASS ON THE INTERNET

      or

      BILL SCHMALFELDT WRITING ON THE INTERNET ABOUT HIS OWN POOP

      or

      BILL SCHMALFELDT WRITING POOR SATIRE ABOUT ANAL RAPE AT DAILYKOS WHICH RESULTED IN HIM GETTING PERMANENTLY BANNED FROM THE MOST LIBERAL BBS

      ON THE INTERNET

      or

      BILL SCHMALFELDT WRITING AND PERFORMING CLEVER (AND BY CLEVER I MEAN VILE, SCREECHING AND HUMORLESS) SATIRES FEATURING ADULTS PEEING ON CUB SCOUTS AS WELL AS ENGAGING IN OTHER DISGUSTING PEDOPHILIC SEX ACTS WITH THEM (HA HA HA AIN’T HE FUNNY?)

      is available to find and examine.

      Oopsie Poopsie.

      Oh, and just an aside…by the above I do not mean to suggest in any way that

      BILL SCHMALFELDT HIMSELF ENGAGES IN SEX ACTS WITH UNDERAGE CUB SCOUTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO URINATION ON SAID CUB SCOUTS, PERFORMING ANAL SEX ON UNDERAGE CUB SCOUTS AND FORCING UNDERAGE CUB SCOUTS TO ORALLY PLEASURE ADULTS AND EACH OTHER.

      So if I have left you with that impression, please get that out of your head right now. It simply isn’t true. At least, not that I can prove.

      BILL SCHMALFELDT MERELY WRITES AND PRODUCES AUDIO SKITS FEATURING SUCH DISGUSTING SEX ACTS IN WHICH HE PERFORMS ALL THE VOICE ROLES INVOLVED, INCLUDING FICTIONAL MINOR CHARACTERS.

      AND THEN BILL SCHMALFELDT OFFERS THESE AUDIO SKITS FOR SALE.

      ON THE INTERNET.

      Some people may think that’s child pornography. It is constitutionally protected opinion to both believe this and to say it.

      In my constitutionally protected opinion, whether it is actually child pornography or not, it is certainly sufficient reason and cause for any reasonable person who encounters such material to desire not to interact with Bill Schmalfeldt for the rest of his or her life.

      Liked by 17 people

      • gmhowell says:

        Looks like kiwi farms is top of the charts for a search of ‘Bill Schmalfeldt’. (Hard to be 100% sure as Google doesn’t give raw results anymore, they’re all tailored based on various bits of voodoo.

        Bing gives up the tumblr about him followed by Bill’s linked in page and his own page (suspended?) prior to Knot My Wisconsin.

        On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:03 AM, BILLY SEZ – The Bill Schmalfeldt Feldtdown Observer wrote:

        > Paul Krendler commented: “Mainly I’m laughing because the only means Bill > Schmalfeldt has to meet women is… THE INTERNET. You know, that place > where the first thing ANYBODY does on meeting someone new on any form of > dating site ON THE INTERNET is type your name in” >

        Liked by 3 people

        • I’m sure any woman seeing his twitter feed would feel all the love he has for women when he uses the most vile and derogatory sexual terms for them.

          Yeah, that makes the chicks real hot, doesn’t it Bill . It’s pathetic I had to add the sarcasm tag so he would realize the nature of the comment when he “stalks” over here and reads everything.

          Just remember Bill, continue like this and you will surely die alone and unloved.

          Liked by 3 people

          • Jane says:

            Oh, excellent point, Canuckamuk!

            They say to see how someone really is, watch how they treat restaurant staff, or store clerks. No decent person would ever get past the vileness and depravity on display throughout the loathsome loser’s twitter and blogs.

            Liked by 2 people

          • Onlooker says:

            Any lady reading that does not think “oh look at that caveman go against insufferable wingnuts”. She thinks “how would he turn that on me if I disappointed, crossed, or even just disagreed with him?” She need only consider the treatment he’s give other former loved ones to imagine.

            Liked by 4 people

      • Jane says:

        Just to be clear, is that BILL SCHMALFELDT of St. Francis, WI who was personally banned by Markos from far left DAILY KOS for writing a disgusting anal rape fantasy/confession?

        The same BILL SCHMALFELDT of St. Francis, WI who wrote and voiced cub scouts engaged in, and forced into, sex acts with each other and adults, being photographed and urinated on, and who attached disgusting and depraved transcripts written by BILL SCHMALFELDT, filed with a WI court by BILL SCHMALFELDT of St. Francis, WI as Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, and Exhibit 3 of the loathsome loser’s frivolous FAILsuit VI, where any prospective “date” can read the filth the grotesque ghoul is so proud of?

        To paraphrase the great and inimitable R. Stacy McCain, “All that is necessary to discredit BILL SCHMALFELDT, [and to prove the depravity of BILL SCHMALFELDT], is to quote BILL SCHMALFELDT.

        Liked by 7 people

        • one handle and stick to it says:

          You mean the Bill Schmalfeldt who is cruising for another female slave as LiberalBill on OurTime? THAT Bill Schmalfeldt?
          https://imgur.com/a/MQrvC

          Like

        • Dr_Mike says:

          No prose of the loathesome loser is so intriguing, so gripping, as when it describes, to a court, in loving detail, how its postings were not kiddie porn. Nowhere else in the world are the differences between its worldview, and a common human worldview, thrown into such stark relief.

          Liked by 2 people

    • Actually, fat burns away completely, so no matter how morbidly obese Schmally gets, he will leave only a very slightly larger than average pile of ashes. They’ll still have to use the extra-large crematorium, to avoid a runaway grease fire, of course.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Jane says:

        hahaha

        I didn’t know that. So when the listed next of kin refuse to have anything to do with the ashes, like they refused to have anything to do with the depraved freak when alive, and then Howard and HZIC claim them, there probably won’t be enough for them to both fill an ugly urn.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Paupers burial, unmarked grave, soon to be overgrown with weeds, unattended, and never visited

          Like

          • Grace says:

            Maybe a Cub Scout troop or two would be willing to stop by from time-to-time and “water” the weeds.

            Seems appropriate.

            Liked by 1 person

          • Dr_Mike says:

            Well, Krendler was talking about a Chilli Con Carnival, and I’ll be happy to show up and contribute.

            We’re gonna need a big thing of Tupperware, though.

            Imagine being competent and wealthy enough that a 20 gal plastic tote, moved by a Bobcat, crashes the funeral and plants the first “handful” of “soil”? Most of us don’t have to imagine that…

            Liked by 2 people

  2. Neal N. Bob says:

    “It was a snarky response, if I wrote it, in reply to the comment seen above mine about the “depraved” nature of a comedy bit I recorded in 2013. I don’t claim to have written the second version either, but it does look like something I may have written. Sadly, Sarah Palmer has destroyed the only way to prove I wrote it.”

    You see, I drink a lot, so I don’t remember things as far back as Saturday.

    I don’t claim to have written it, but you’ll note that I’m not explicitly denying it, either. It sure looks creepily aggressive enough to be mine. My lifelong fascination with my own biological waste is there, so there’s that. And I’ve always wanted to urinate on a minor, but NAMBLA kicked me out for being an asshole.

    So I guess this means that I get to file another lulzsuit that’s chock full of perjury in North Carolina while facing sanctions here in Wisconsin, teeter on the edge of default in Maryland, and face the prospect of being sued out of existence in Virginia because STRATEGERGY! I’m a lot like Hitler, only fatter and not as handsome or as good with people!

    *hic*

    Liked by 8 people

  3. theman9876 says:

    Are there still Orders of Protection preventing Bill Schmalfeldt from contacting the publisher/owner of this blog? Why the hell is this vial excuse of a human being commenting on a blog he knows he is NOT welcome? Why would Bill be communicating directly with the publisher/owner of this blog, and not her attorney of record?

    Looks like Defendant and Disgusting Human Being Bill Schamalfeldt has gotten himself into even MORE trouble in the past 24 hours. I’m sure that any future Court where legal action is conducted will be fascinated by Bill’s revealing comments of the past several days. He has done more damage to himself by his own words, that anybody else lately.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Neal N. Bob says:

      I don’t know about that. The Pee Freak in Chief, Bill Schmalfeldt, will always have his reputation for almost blistering public perversion. He always wanted to be famous and, in at least a small way, he is now. Sure, he’s not as famous as, say, Ed Gein, but he’s also very lazy.

      No court can that away from him.

      Like

      • Kobayashi Maru says:

        Is this the same Bill Schmalfeldt, aka William Schmalfeldt, aka, Lester Klemper, aka Bill Matthews, aka Matthew Lillefeldt, aka Bill Munko, who is the subject of a restraining order in favor of a three year old little boy? The same Bill Schmalfeldt who recently offered to urinate on a commenter’s child? The same Bill Schmalfeldt who makes, records, and sells “parodies” of cub scouts being sexually abused and urinated upon? The same Bill Schmalfeldt who threatened to press his penis against the “swollen anal tisssue” of a minor male commenting on the XM fan forum? That one?

        Liked by 7 people

        • Neal N. Bob says:

          One and the same.

          The funny thing about the Pee Freak in Chief is that his deviant public fantasies almost never involve females of any age, just boys.

          The inside of his head is just like the Neverland Ranch, only much bigger and with more free space.

          Liked by 5 people

    • Dianna says:

      As has been said by *BILL SCHMALFELDT* himself, a restraining order is a piece of paper, and means nothing.

      Also, commenting here and on Hogewash! are the only ways he can be certain anyone will read even the first sentence of one of his whines.

      Did I mention that I’m on vacation? I am! It’s great!

      Liked by 5 people

    • Yes, the RO is still in place. Yes, Bill has been notified that he is not to contact me except through my lawyer. And yes. Bill has done more damage to himself EVER than anybody else.

      Liked by 5 people

      • theman9876 says:

        ^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^

        Bill hates nothing more than smart, confident & strong women.(maybe smart, confident, strong and POLITICALLY RIGHT women)

        Liked by 3 people

      • one handle and stick to it says:

        Um…maybe it’s like to contact law enforcement, then.
        Orders of Protection are toothless unless the victims are willing to report violations to the appropriate authorities. Just sayin’…

        Liked by 1 person

    • one handle and stick to it says:

      “Are there still Orders of Protection preventing Bill Schmalfeldt from contacting the publisher/owner of this blog? Why the hell is this vial excuse of a human being commenting on a blog he knows he is NOT welcome?”

      Short answer: Bill Schmalfeldt violates the restraining orders because no one has filed police reports against him yet. He hasn’t been arrested for his criminal conduct yet. He has yet to have a judge make clear to him that he shuts TFU or else he gets the handcuffs.

      Only the fear of arrest and jail has any hope of deterring Bill Schmafeldt’s psychotic tendencies of threatening, stalking and harassing people. Just like Deb Frisch.

      Like

      • gmhowell says:

        It’s been pointed out multiple times that law enforcement aren’t always interested in enforcing these restraining orders short of a writ of mandamus.

        Discretion. Like that exercised by James Comey and Loretta Lynch.

        On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:39 PM, BILLY SEZ – The Bill Schmalfeldt Feldtdown Observer wrote:

        > one handle and stick to it commented: “”Are there still Orders of > Protection preventing Bill Schmalfeldt from contacting the publisher/owner > of this blog? Why the hell is this vial excuse of a human being commenting > on a blog he knows he is NOT welcome?” Short answer: Bill Schmalfeldt viola” >

        Liked by 2 people

  4. Dianna says:

    He’s always screaming about “libel per se” and he’s never once gotten it right. Never. Once.

    Liked by 3 people

    • And he most likely never will. After all, it’s not like he can just stop being a sub-literate buffoon, short of the cure for all his ills.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Neal N. Bob says:

      “I’ve not lost one of my lulzsuits on the merits. I’ve lost them because I’m an idiot!”

      I will give the fetish fanatic credit for one thing, anyone else would have become boring by now. But that special combination of dementia, stupidity, scotch and benzodiazprine always makes it feel like the first time.

      My apologies for dragging Lou Gramm into this ugliness. He deserves better.

      Liked by 3 people

      • JeffM says:

        It is true that Witless Willie has never lost on the merits. Of course it is equally true that he has never won on the merits. He seems to conclude that his uniform failure even to get to the point where the merits are decided somehow argues that his opinion on the merits is credible. For those who are not witless, his repeated failure to find the right courthouse, his inability to effect proper service, and his claiming to be the victim of a tort not even recognized in his chosen jurisdiction indicate that his opinion on substantive law is about on a par with the opinion of my dog.

        Witless is again nattering about defamation per se. Not once has Willy or his cronies understood the term They repeatedly read the phrase literally to mean that just saying certain things is defamatory; in Willy’s case, he seems to believe that saying such things means that a trial is not even necessary. But defamation per se is a term of art, not to be construed literally. It relates to damages once defamation has been proven; it has no relevance to whether or not defamation occurred.

        Liked by 4 people

        • gmhowell says:

          For someone who has never won in his entire life, ‘not losing’ is probably the best he can hope for at this point.

          On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:42 PM, BILLY SEZ – The Bill Schmalfeldt Feldtdown Observer wrote:

          > JeffM commented: “It is true that Witless Willie has never lost on the > merits. Of course it is equally true that he has never won on the merits. > He seems to conclude that his uniform failure even to get to the point > where the merits are decided somehow argues that his opin” >

          Liked by 1 person

    • Dianna says:

      It was much less disgusting than what he’d written. He should be grateful.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Yeah, that’s what he copy/pasted, but failed to understand. He thinks changing the target of his fictional urination changes the meaning in a defamatory way. He thinks that because he’s stupid. His ability to occasionally write in complete and grammatically correct sentences notwithstanding, he is, in technical jargon, a dummy. A dope. A lackwit. A feeb. He’s just not bright, much less anywhere near as bright as he thinks.

      Liked by 5 people

      • crawford421 says:

        “So, Mr. Schmalfeldt — do you mind if I call you DF? — you claim that changing your words to express that you HAVE peed on YOUR children is worse than your original statement that you WANT to pee on OTHER PEOPLE’S children? Now, for the jury, let me play some audio the plaintiff recorded a few years ago…”

        Liked by 8 people

  5. Techno Jinxx says:

    I dont think this is a particularly good idea on Stinky’s part, but here he basically admits to KNOWING and WILLFULLY violating one of his NINE restraining orders…

    I've explained to Sarah Palmer how she can avoid legal consequences, but she is just… too… stupid. So, what alternative do I have? #sue— Public Domain Radio (@MusicUnshackled) July 7, 2016

    Liked by 6 people

  6. Neal N. Bob says:

    https://twitter.com/MusicUnshackled/status/751088597122580480

    I dunno, Bill. Walk away and preserve some tiny piece of your dignity? Even more than the Internet, lulzsuits are forever and law students will be laughing at you for as long as the Republic stands. Although, by the looks of the current presidential campaign, that might only be about seven or eight months.

    But that won’t happen because Beefeater Bill doesn’t learn from previous negative experiences. If it’s true that each lulzsuit shaves years off of his life, we’re getting to the point where he should have croaked three weeks ago.

    On the other hand, Lulzsuit VII might be the greatest one of all!

    “Plaintiff violated an active order of protection to volunteer to urinate on minor children, which Defendant then twisted into something tawdry and ugly.”

    Best. Lulzsuit. EVER!

    Liked by 9 people

  7. A Reader #1 says:

    Bill Schmalfeldt left a disgusting comment on this blog a few days ago, despite having been ordered to cease all contact with the blog owner. He violated the irder of protection.

    The real problem, however, is how to make himslf the victim when he is the one who came here in violation of the law, and offered to urinate in a commenter’s children? Why, DARVO, of course:

    What happened instead was a strategy that one psychologist has named DARVO — Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender:
    DARVO refers to a reaction that perpetrators of wrong doing, particularly sexual offenders, may display in response to being held accountable for their behavior. The perpetrator or offender may Deny the behavior, Attack the individual doing the confronting, and Reverse the roles of Victim and Offender such that the perpetrator assumes the victim role and turns the true victim into an alleged offender. . . .
    It is important to distinguish types of denial, for an innocent person will probably deny a false accusation. Thus denial is not evidence of guilt. However, I propose that a certain kind of indignant self-righteousness, and overly stated denial, may in fact relate to guilt.
    I hypothesize that if an accusation is true, and the accused person is abusive, the denial is more indignant, self-righteous and manipulative, as compared with denial in other cases. Similarly, I have observed that actual abusers threaten, bully and make a nightmare for anyone who holds them accountable or asks them to change their abusive behavior. This attack, intended to chill and terrify, typically includes threats of lawsuits, overt and covert attacks, on the whistle-blower’s credibility and so on.
    The attack will often take the form of focusing on ridiculing the person who attempts to hold the offender accountable. The attack will also likely focus on ad hominem instead of intellectual/evidential issues.

    The @Nero Solution (and an Unfortunate Update on the #FreeKate Fallout)

    This is exactly what Bill Schmalfeldt is currently doing with his obscene tweets and threats of impending doom

    Liked by 5 people

  8. Minemyown says:

    Public Domain Radio ‏@MusicUnshackled 16h16 hours ago

    That is “libel per se” Sarah. I can file in NC and never have to show up because the proof of the libel is right there. Close your blog.

    If he believes he will not have to show up, then I have some Tropical beach front property located at 90 ° N, 0 ° W that I will let him have at a very good price sight unseen.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Bill. Please spend the rest of the summer working on your tan. Then head over to Minnesota and mouth off to a cop.
    Thank you.

    Liked by 5 people

  10. Neal N. Bob says:

    I wonder how well the Diminished Capacity Kid’s romantic quest will go when his love of water sports and pre-pubescents becomes searchable on the Googles?

    Liked by 2 people

    • one handle and stick to it says:

      I know, right? I HOPE someone has forwarded copies of this to Cindy, Erich and company at Canticle and Juniper Courts. Bill Schmalfeldt is a pedophilic psycho who needs to be held criminally responsible for his illegal stalking and threatening behavior. The sooner the better.

      Like

  11. one handle and stick to it says:

    You were kinder than I was…
    Dear Bill Schmalfeldt:
    Close this blog? F5CK YOU!
    /s/
    The Mgmt.
    p.s. Go tug your Suzuki a bit more if you don’t like it.
    http://imgur.com/WiOH6gx

    Liked by 2 people

  12. lorddewclaw says:

    Fatass.. you have been a leech on society since birth.

    And only talent deficient hacks like you think that the crap you produce with that children’s music maker in your grubby fat fingers could possibly be called “song.” I’m sure that FiFi Fergie and the talentless pedo lead midget “singer” (~snicker~) of Post-Op Critical recommended that worthless noisemaker to you. It’s about their speed.

    I created better music than you ever have when I was two, banging away on a Fisher-Price xylophone.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Joe Smirnoff says:

    The Fat One is definitely touting crap…maybe he will roll them into little balls again????

    Like

Leave a comment